We will write a custom essay sample on Han China vs. But the Chinese, in opposition to the Romans, developed an elaborate bureaucracy to hold their empire together. As gravity clearly shows, what goes up, must come down.
China finally reunified in B. This economic collapse was the onset of many civil wars and disputes which further weakened these empires. Contrarily, Rome did not have such a philosophy to use as the base for its political structure — there was no ideology of political organization and social conduct that could survive as long as the Chinese government.
Contrarily, Romans were more aware of the right of individuals, so citizens were more willing ask for more from the government, rather than be content with what they already had.
After many years of turmoil and bloodshed, Christianity was adopted into society. While key differences may be present, their social structures, influencing religions, and causes of collapse unify them.
A similarity between the collapse between Han China and Imperial Rome was that they both had rivalry in elite factions that weakened the system. In both societies, the genesis of their key religions were quite similar.
The major difference is that Roman administration was very dilapidated affair, relying on regional aristocratic elites and an army to provide cohesion. At the root of the whole problem was the need for more military might.
However, their political systems, societal views, including the influence of religion, and economic instruments varied significantly. The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.
Throughout the course of time, religion has had an enormous influence on societies. Only 2 died of natural causes. Commerce was hindered and many people moved from the city back into the country, causing an economic regression. Both empires established effective centralized governmental control over their vast regions and huge populations.
Lastly, the economic instruments of the two empires were based on the same factor: The network of roads built throughout China also enabled trade on a large scale.
Just as a ball tosses into the air falls back to the ground, so is the fate of all empires, past, present, and future. The way power was appointed also greatly differed. Romans developed an elaborate body of law, dealing with matters such as justice, property, business, and family life.
China was threatened by the Xiongnu and other nomadic people in the north. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse.
This also is true for the Han on Roman empires. Though the political structures of the societies were different, they contained many similarities in terms of their social orders. Without the developments of Rome and Han China, the world would not be the same as it is today.
The eastern half however continued to flourish, but it was never quite as powerful as the former empire. The biggest similarity for their collapse was that they both got overextended and too expensive into where they were not able to be sustained by their available resources.
Unlike this, the Chinese emperors ruled under the mandate of heaven, giving them more than enough time to perfect the structure. More essays like this: In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated.
Nevertheless, they had similarities as well. In Han China, a different religion had effect, or technically two religions. The empires were expanding, causes the need for more soldiers, which drained their coffers.
The reason for the similarities in the collapse in both empires was because they both witnessed similar events that weakened their empire. While it may be true that most of the political power was reserved for the wealthy, the people still had more political power than those of the Han empire.
First, their uses of a family structure and treatment of women are similar but their ability to move between social classes and political influences varied greatly.Free Essay: Han China and Classical Rome When comparing Han China and Classical Rome, many political, geographical, and religious similarities can be found.
Compare and Contrast Han China and Rome Essay Sample. Empires on their outside may seem very different and unique. However, when you get down to their fundamentals, you begin to truly realize how similar they are. Free Essay: Han China and Ancient Rome are without doubt two of the most powerful and famous empires in ancient times.
The Han Dynasty ruled China from The Han Dynasty mi-centre.com Roman Empire The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty of China had many similarities and differences. Many of these similarities and differences were political, social, and economical. Some of the similarities included the resemblances of political figures, the role of women, and the parallels in each empire’s trade.
The societies of Han China ( BCE CE) and Classical Rome (27 BC- AD) were greatly influenced by their political, social, and economic factors. Comparatively, unstable political situations encouraged the need for patriarchal societies and the family unit.
However, their political systems, societal views, including the influence of religion. Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on.Download