The body of literature debating this question, especially in connection with The Prince and Discourses, has grown to truly staggering proportions. Indeed, this is precisely why successive French monarchs have left their people disarmed: The reference to Cicero one of the few in the Discourses confirms that Machiavelli has in mind here a key feature of classical republicanism: Concentrating on the claim in The Prince that a head of state ought to do good if he can, but must be prepared to commit evil if he must Machiavelli58Skinner argues that Machiavelli prefers Machiavelli personal and political implications essay to moral virtue ceteris paribus.
Unlike The Prince, the Discourses was authored over a long period of time commencing perhaps in or and completed in oralthough again only published posthumously in New Interdisciplinary Essays, Manchester: The liberty of the whole, for Machiavelli, depends upon the liberty of its component parts.
For others, Machiavelli may best be described as a man of conventional, if unenthusiastic, piety, prepared to bow to the externalities of worship but not deeply devoted in either soul or mind to the tenets of Christian faith.
The French regime, because it seeks security above all else for the people as well as for their rulerscannot permit what Machiavelli takes to be a primary means of promoting liberty. Machiavelli sees politics to be a sort of a battlefield on a different scale. This all comes from having disarmed his people and having preferred … to enjoy the immediate profit of being able to plunder the people and of avoiding an imaginary rather than a real danger, instead of doing things that would assure them and make their states perpetually happy.
Although the king cannot give such liberty to the masses, he can provide the security that they crave: Hence, the successful ruler needs special training. But how are we to square this with his statements in The Prince?
The Discourses makes clear that conventional Christianity saps from human beings the vigor required for active civil life Machiavelli—, — The RenaissanceCambridge: Fortuna is the enemy of political order, the ultimate threat to the safety and security of the state.
Hobbes believes that humanity is in need of a strong, central authority in order to be kept in control and not descend into a state of chaos and political upheaval.
The law-abiding character of the French regime ensures security, but that security, while desirable, ought never to be confused with liberty. This is not to say that mankind is purely evil, but Hobbes seems to operate under the notion that mankind will not be unwilling to hinder others for his own personal gain.
Why would Machiavelli effusively praise let alone even analyze a hereditary monarchy in a work supposedly designed to promote the superiority of republics?
The Prince purports to reflect the self-conscious political realism of an author who is fully aware—on the basis of direct experience with the Florentine government—that goodness and right are not sufficient to win and maintain political office.
The First Century, Oxford: In this state, mankind is constantly trying to destroy one another in the hopes of gaining others resources and other material possessions while maintaining their own safety. The effect of the Machiavellian dichotomy between the need for flexibility and the inescapable constancy of character is to demonstrate an inherent practical limitation in single-ruler regimes.
Concomitantly, a Machiavellian perspective directly attacks the notion of any grounding for authority independent of the sheer possession of power. The Discourses certainly draw upon the same reservoir of language and concepts that fed The Prince, but the former treatise leads us to draw conclusions quite different from—many scholars have said contradictory to—the latter.
An Intellectual Biography, Princeton:Machiavelli (Essay Sample) The word Machiavellism has been crafted to depict a leadership’s choice or action whose implications should be evaluated by the outcome, justified by the phrase ‘the end justify the means’.
According to Machiavelli, political and philosophical idealism written in such works as Plato’s, are what a. In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s objective and course are direct in both their intent and instruction.
Concerned more with political acumen than social skill, Machiavelli’s The Prince examines the course of leadership; through historical comparison and reasoning, he draws a path through the various hurdles that accompany a ruler.
Machiavelli is praised for the political implications of his writing in The Prince. However, many do not see the personal implications of Machiavelli's work, because the motivations for action are spoken in terms of political domination and the acquisition of power.
The Personal and Political Implications of Machiavelli's The Prince Abstract Machiavelli is praised for the political implications of his writing in The Prince. Political philosophy is a subfield of philosophy that focuses heavily on the political, legal, and moral implications of different schools of thought within society.
and the place of indiviudals within society. This essay will focus on Machiavelli's concepts of Ultius, Inc. "Sample Essay on Political Philosophy." Ultius | Custom Writing 5/5(2). In order to understand the implications of Machiavelli's writing it is important to explore this concept and how it shapes his political theory.
This essay will be divided into two parts.
The first will deal with the definition of virtu and an examination of all the ideas that are included in this term.Download