Regardless of how objective, technical, or scientific the subject matter, the author s will have made many decisions during the research and writing process, and each of these decisions is a potential topic for examination and debate, rather than for blind acceptance.
Why did the writer select that particular process of analysis? If there is a word in the text that is not clear or difficult to define in context: It forces you to pay attention as you read and to read more slowly rather than skimming. What are the possible next issues to be addressed on this particular subject?
Linking evidence to argument On its own, evidence cannot contribute to academic debate. For example, you could ask: What are the main points of the article? If a reader "skims" the text, superficial characteristics and information are as far as the reader goes.
In these cases the evidence may include items such as quotes from interviews, extracts of text, and diagrams showing how themes might connect. Being able to read critically is basically the difference between being able to recognize the words written in an article and being able to understand their meaning, context and significance.
Who else is writing about this subject?
What does the future hold in this area? Keep a reading journal In addition to note-taking, it is often helpful to regularly record your responses and thoughts in a more permanent place that is yours to consult. Read the article thoroughly, taking notes as you go along.
Every word is important, and if part of the text is thick with technical terms, it is doubly important to know how the author is using them.
Read it more than once A single read-through of an article is usually not enough to read it critically. Write down the main points and arguments that you remember from the text. Critical readers seek knowledge; they do not "rewrite" a work to suit their own personalities.
Did it achieve this goal? Write a critical summary A great way to make sure you really understood the text is to write a summary of the article. A practical starting point therefore, is to consider anything you read not as fact, but as the argument of the writer.
Your task as an enlightened critical reader is to read what is on the page, giving the writer a fair chance to develop ideas and allowing yourself to reflect thoughtfully, objectively, on the text. The nature of the evidence presented at these two extremes is different, but in both cases you need to look for the rationale for the selection and interpretation of the evidence presented, and the rationale for the construction of the argument.
Using your notes and highlighted areas, think about the following themes: This is a crucial point in deepening your understanding of it. By developing a habit of reading and writing in conjunction, both skills will improve.
In any case, the more thoughts you can gather on the subject, the stronger your comprehension of it will be. A critical reading gets at "deep structure" if there is such a thing apart from the superficial text!
At the technical and scientific end of the spectrum, relevant evidence may include information on: Again, this appears obvious, but it is a factor in a "close reading. Critical reading does not have to be all negative The aim of critical reading is not to find fault, but to assess the strength of the evidence and the argument.
Specific guidance will be available within specialties on what to look for. You need to be prepared to step into the academic debate and to make your own evaluation of how much you are willing to accept what you read.
Critical reading involves using logical and rhetorical skills. What is the difference? Why did the writer select that particular topic of enquiry in the first place? Without having to look at the text again, recall the essence of the argument and the main points that you can remember. Writing while reading aids your memory in many ways, especially by making a link that is unclear in the text concrete in your own writing.
Prepare to read with an open mind.
Who was the article written for? Note taking As you read, it can be helpful to use a table to record the information that you know you will need later. Go over your recall notes carefully and give the text another reading.- In this essay I will address the importance of reading in a classroom setting and how teachers can engage learners and enable them to develop their knowledge and skills in reading.
It is important that teachers allocate time for learners to encounter reading in its two forms, fiction and non-fiction, therefore I will address both of these. Critical reading and 5 sub-skills Essay by rmatrixm, College, Undergraduate, February download word file, 3 pages download word file, 3 pages 4 votes/5(4).
Each method of reading has its place, but critical reading is too often supplanted by reading for information. They differ in the degree of understanding they require. Reading for information is the more basic, and thus more fundamental, of the two reading skills.
Critical reading means being able to reflect on what a text says, what it describes and what it means by scrutinising the style and structure of the writing, the language used as well as the content. Critical Thinking is an Extension of Critical Reading.
critical reading Essays: Overcritical reading Essays, critical reading Term Papers, critical reading Research Paper, Book Reports. ESSAYS, term and research papers available for UNLIMITED access.
5 Best Ways To Improve Your Critical Reading Skills Leave a reply Critical reading is a crucial skill for anyone seeking in-depth knowledge of a subject or who are aiming to become an expert or thought leader in a certain area.Download