On the other hand, the pro-choicer wants to find a moral principle concerning the wrongness of killing which tends to be narrow in scope in order that fetuses will not fall under it. Clearly, it is wrong to kill adult human beings. This is a further merit of this theory.
Abortion will not be wrong. To describe this as the loss of life can be misleading, however. Accordingly, it does not seem that a desire account of the wrongness of killing can provide a justification of a pro-choice ethic of abortion which is nearly as adequate as the value of a human-future justification of an anti-abortion ethic.
Personhood theories of the wrongness of killing, on the other hand, cannot straightforwardly account for the wrongness of killing infants and young children. If P1 then killing a fetus is immoral P3: It is immoral to kill a being like me. This might suggest to an impartial observer if there are any that the abortion issue is unresolvable.
I think that the most compelling counterargument is there simply cannot be one correct answer when it comes to abortion because there are so many variables that create unique circumstances. Kant believed that we do not have direct duties to animals at all, because they are not persons.
By then he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you. We desire life, because we value the goods of this life. His central argument for this seems to be that, even though plants and the permanently unconscious are alive, they clearly cannot be victims.
This essay sets out an argument that purports to show, as well as any argument in ethics can show, that abortion is, except possibly in rare cases, seriously immoral, that it is in the same moral category as killing an innocent adult human being.
Now, how might one deal with this standoff? To entail the wrongness of abortion, the value of a future-like-ours account has only to provide a sufficient, but not a necessary, condition for the wrongness of killing.
In the fourth place, the account of the wrongness of killing defended in this essay does straightforwardly entail that it is prima facie seriously wrong to kill children and infants, for we do presume that they have futures of value. There are both plausibilities and difficulties with the standard positions.
The desire account is subject to a deeper difficulty. That is so only if the person being killed does not have a future like ours.Journal of Philosophy, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY their opponents, and why, to others, this issue seems to be unresolv- able.
An analysis of the nature of this standoff suggests a strategy for not also make abortion immoral.
This is no easy task. For many people, abortion is immoral—it is the taking of a human life. Is there ever an exception to abortion being immoral —rape, unwanted pregnancy.
There are several reasons why someone would consider abortion, but there are many reasons and alternatives not to. Why Abortion is Immoral by Don Marquis is an essay that claims that abortion is morally wrong, and uses one argument in particular to explain why.
He argues that many of us would agree that it is wrong to kill a human, and if you believe that then you should also have that view on abortions.
If you. - Abortion is Murder and Immoral In Americas Society Abortion is a topic that most people rather not face.
More and more abortions occur everyday, causing potential lives to be terminated due to irresponsible sexual activity among adults and teens. Why Abortion is Immoral – Don Marquis Marquis attempts to demonstrate that abortion is morally on a par with the killing of an adult human; that is, he tries to show that aborting a fetus is, except in exceptional circumstances, a serious moral wrong.
The Abortion Debate: Are Abortions Immoral? Print Reference this Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can hence the morality of abortion not only depends on the fetus but also on woman's moral obligation to sustain the life of the fetus.Download